-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Run4-hgx282 Remove overlap in for EB in 2 recent Phase2 scenarios D82 and D83 #33530
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-33530/22299
|
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @makortel, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-63b73b/14600/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
+1 |
test parameters:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals |
test parameters:
|
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTComparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
@srimanob @silviodonato @cvuosalo @qliphy There was a DAS error for workflow 4.29 which has nothing to do with this PR. Please approve and integrate this PR |
+Upgrade The change is on D82 and D83, to remove the overlap. PR test on those geometry works fine. The error is on input for non-related to the PR workflows. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
merge |
PR description:
Remove overlap in for EB in 2 recent Phase2 scenarios D82 and D83
PR validation:
Tested using the workflows 37034.0 and 37434.0
if this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR:
Nothing special